NHL Parlay Recap: Stamkos Sinks Ticket, Nashville Hedge Secures Profit

Remember when the news was about what happened, not how to feel about it? 1440's Daily Digest is bringing that back. Every morning, they sift through 100+ sources to deliver a concise, unbiased briefing — no pundits, no paywalls, no politics. Just the facts, all in five minutes. For free.

Read the newsletter trusted by 4.5 million fact-seekers.

Two legs cashed. Steven Stamkos ended the third on the power play. Our +225 NHL parlay lost, but a live Nashville hedge kept the combined position profitable.

Carolina beat the Islanders 5–3, New Jersey edged St. Louis 5–4 in overtime, and Nashville defeated Colorado 3–2 in overtime. The final ticket tells one story. Managing the last leg tells the rest.

Carolina jumped ahead 2–0. New York fought back to 3–3 before William Carrier’s late winner and Jalen Chatfield’s empty-net goal.

The Hurricanes made us wait through a competitive finish, but Carolina ML −190 cashed and put the first leg in the win column.

New Jersey surrendered a 4–1 lead, then Jesper Bratt rescued the Devils in overtime.

Bratt finished a breakaway off Dougie Hamilton’s feed. St. Louis had turned a comfortable Devils advantage into a tense finish, but New Jersey ML −215 cashed. Two legs were home; Colorado was the only remaining decision.

Parker Kelly tied the game 2–2 at 5:08 of the second period. Neither side broke through again in regulation.

Devon Toews took a hooking penalty in overtime, and Stamkos capitalized at 2:18 of the extra period. His power-play winner delivered Nashville’s 3–2 victory and ended our Colorado ML −220 leg.

The three-leg parlay at +225 lost 2U. Carolina and New Jersey won.

After New Jersey secured the second leg and Colorado tied its game 2–2 in the second period, we had an opportunity to review our exposure. The original 2U ticket stood to win 4.5U in profit, with a 6.5U total return. Only one game remained.

That made the last leg binary: Colorado or Nashville, with overtime and a shootout included in the moneyline settlement. A regulation-only wager (3-WAY WAGER) would not have covered the same outcomes.

Ideally, we were looking for a 4U total cashout, the original 2U back plus 2U profit. No cashout was offered. Nashville was available live at +120, so we placed a 2U hedge.

That hedge would win 2.4U in profit if Nashville prevailed, returning 4.4U including its stake. If Colorado won instead, the parlay’s 4.5U profit would be reduced by the 2U hedge loss, leaving 2.5U net.

Final accounting: 4U staked across both wagers, 4.4U returned, +0.4U net profit. The hedge did not turn the parlay into a winning ticket; it protected the combined position.

Bankroll management is key to sustaining a long-term approach. A chance to lock in an even-money profit on the original stake, or a cashout returning twice that stake or more, deserves a serious review. The price, amount secured and upside surrendered still matter; a hedge or cashout is not automatically the best choice.

The two most important questions are:

Here, Nashville at +120 let us cover the original parlay loss and retain a small profit while keeping more upside if Colorado won. Stamkos decided the game. The hedge had already defined our exposure.

Game sources: NHL.com: Carolina–New York; New Jersey Devils game story; All About the Jersey; Reuters: Nashville–Colorado. Wager results reflect our tickets and live hedge.

Wager responsibly. Betting involves risk; no approach guarantees long-term profitability.